Sunday, November 04, 2012
News to Know Nov 4th Berlin Pond
Sent by Corinne Stridsberg
and also posted at http://socialenergy.blogspot.com
If you're not already
receiving this news by email, send an email to request this to
corinnestridsberg@gmail.com
Check out the Berlin ,
Vermont Community News page on facebook
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Berlin-Vermont/205922199452224
***********************
NOTES:
Please note that the
information I include in what I send out is either because folks have sent it
to me or I've noticed it somewhere and think others in Berlin would be interested in it. There is also plenty of news and happenings
that I just don't get to passing along.
I've been a little busy lately and so when I sent out this news on
Sunday I didn't dig back quite far enough or look back closely at my prior
issue to see what was included. Always
feel free to send along information to me, I just can't guarantee that I will
be able to pass it along in a timely manner.
I am resending this News To Know to include "No
On Berlin Pond
Access" by Ellen Drysdale at her request.
Note that her letter to the editor is the first item and her note to me
is as follows:
Hi Corinne,
Thanks for publishing all the Berlin Pond stuff. I was a little disappointed that, tho my letter to the editor was quoted in Nate Smead's letter, my letter was not included here. NS implies that I don't mind the activity at BP, but my letter makes it clear that I do. Let me know if you'd like me to send it to you. . .Ellen Drysdale
Thanks for publishing all the Berlin Pond stuff. I was a little disappointed that, tho my letter to the editor was quoted in Nate Smead's letter, my letter was not included here. NS implies that I don't mind the activity at BP, but my letter makes it clear that I do. Let me know if you'd like me to send it to you. . .Ellen Drysdale
Today two News to Know are
being sent out, one on Berlin Pond and one with other news.
Voting is at the Municipal
Offices on Tuesday November 6, 2012 from 8AM
to 7PM .
On the ballot along with the
Federal and State Offices is the Berlin Pond question.
It reads: Article 1.
Shall the Town of Berlin
allow public access to the Town owned land along Berlin Pond for recreational
uses?
Please take the time to read
this information regarding Berlin Pond
***********************
Included below please find:
NO ON BERLIN POND ACCESS
VOTE FOR ACCESS TOBERLIN POND
VOTE FOR ACCESS TO
EDITORIAL FROM THE BRIDGE
VOTE TO PRESERVE
VOTERS TO DECIDE ACCESS, NOT RIGHTS
***
NO ON BERLIN POND ACCESS
Pub 10/12/12 Times Argus
I’d like to urge Berlin residents to vote NO on the ballot issue regarding opening Berlin’s shoreline parcel on Berlin pond for development of a fishing access.
When I came to live in a house overlooking Berlin Pond over 30 years ago, I chafed againstMontpelier ’s ordinances forbidding the use of it. But as the years
went by, I began to appreciate the unique charm of a truly wild lake, available
to me and my neighbors, and also to hundreds of walkers, runners, bicyclists
and birders.
That a wild untouched lake lay so close to civilization and the interstate made it even more of a jewel. The complete wildness of Berlin Pond was truly a phenomenon, unique inVermont and rare in the rest of the U.S. When the Supreme Court decision changed all that, I was
surprised at the depth of my sorrow. I admit that since the Supreme Court
decision in May opened the pond’s waters, the sky has not fallen.
The small amount of trash left at the celebrated culvert access onMirror Lake is quickly cleaned up, usually by the “selfish, elite
residents” of the pond. We continue to hear loons and see waterfowl and other
wildlife. Use of the pond has been light, as many are deterred by the lousy
access at the culvert — steep, rocky and increasingly eroded.
Officials at VT Fish and Wildlife would like to build a safe, attractive access area onBerlin ’s sliver of land. But remember that their job is to
advocate for the rights of fishermen and hunters, not for lovers of pure
wilderness. They are good at their job and Vermont fishermen can choose among over 800 ponds, lakes, and
streams. Those of us who enjoy peacefully contemplating an untouched body of
water are out of luck.
IfBerlin residents allow a fishing access to be built on its
shoreline property, the boating use of the pond will increase exponentially. It
would still be a pretty pond — but it would no longer be wild. And that would
be very sad for those who value true wilderness.
Ellen Drysdale,Berlin
***Pub 10/12/12 Times Argus
I’d like to urge Berlin residents to vote NO on the ballot issue regarding opening Berlin’s shoreline parcel on Berlin pond for development of a fishing access.
When I came to live in a house overlooking Berlin Pond over 30 years ago, I chafed against
That a wild untouched lake lay so close to civilization and the interstate made it even more of a jewel. The complete wildness of Berlin Pond was truly a phenomenon, unique in
The small amount of trash left at the celebrated culvert access on
Officials at VT Fish and Wildlife would like to build a safe, attractive access area on
If
Ellen Drysdale,
VOTE FOR ACCESS
TO BERLIN POND
Pub 10/27/12 Times ArgusA few of the landowners around Berlin Pond have been fighting tooth and nail all summer to keep others off the pond. A few have made vocal appearances at meetings. Some have sent letters to local newspapers with myriad reasons people should keep out. One pond neighbor even started a sign-up sheet to organize troops to fight to “save the pond.” At last check, five people had signed the sheet.
Not all of the landowners are against access. Those that are have tried to make a loud voice. They’ve tried to recruit the many walkers, joggers and bird-watchers to join their crusade. They’ve tried to create an “us against them” scenario.
Ellen Drysdale conveyed, quite honestly, that “the sky has not fallen” after the Supreme Court ruling. She admits that the usage has been light and the wildlife is still thriving.
I hope
Nate Smead,
***
By Tom Herzig
On Vermont General Election Day, Tuesday, November 6, Article 1 on the Town of
The question is a non-binding referendum on an issue that would likely spark a spirited discussion at a town meeting. Since it’s a presidential election year, a high turnout is expected. If there’s a decisive vote, the Select Board will likely be swayed. A toss-up will prompt more discussion.
Many Vermonters, including some registered
Berlin Pond lies within the Town of
“The City of
Rick Sanborn, who owns R&L Archery, a sporting goods store in Barre, was one of the scofflaws who set the legal proceedings in motion by purposefully getting cited for kayaking on the pond. “I know there are people who feel the pond is being violated if they see a boat on the water,” Sanborn said. “But we’re not talking about cutting a road into the wilderness. There is a road all the way around the pond. The Interstate and an airport are nearby. You can hear chain saws and motor vehicles. Rules will be in place just as they are at many ponds in the state. Gas engines will not be allowed. Lead pellet bird shot is not allowed. Any waterfowl must be taken from a boat because the shoreline is posted. The resident ducks and geese will catch on very quickly.”
“Some people have the attitude, ‘I got mine, you keep out’,” Sanborn offered. “but you only control what you own.”
“There are issues on both sides,” Berlin Town Administrator Jeff Schulz said. “It’s a polarizing topic. The first people in the door were opposed to any access. The second wave wanted to open it up. Since then, we have heard from people on both sides and it was decided to have a referendum.”
In September, a group “Citizens to Protect Berlin Pond” organized and issued a press release announcing it will “work to maintain Berlin Pond in its historic, untrammeled condition” and “welcome support from all Vermonters who are committed to keeping Berlin Pond natural, protected and undeveloped”.
“I’m concerned there could be a Pandora’s box effect,” said Maggie Kerrin, a Citizens to Protect Berlin Pond committee member. “Berlin Pond is a unique resource because it has historically existed as a place where natural processes have been allowed to predominate without human interference. The Berlin Conservation Commission has advised against increased access to the pond. There are 34 lakes and ponds within a 20-mile radius of
In a July submission to the Town of Berlin Select Board, the Berlin Conservation Commission wrote, “Berlin Pond is designated an Important Bird Area by the Audubon Society, which has stated that due to the size and relatively undeveloped nature of the pond and associated uplands, Berlin Pond is home to a host of priority species. Increased recreational use could result in higher disturbance rates.”
Citizens to Protect Berlin Pond has retained Wheeler Environmental Services, a Barre consulting firm, to assess whether or not existing wetland regulations might be applicable to the potential access area. “Nearly the entire Town-owned parcel is a Class Two wetland,” firm founder Brad Wheeler said, “and as such, any filling in or within 50 feet of the wetland will require a permit approval from the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources. Approval from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers under the federal Clean Water Act will also likely be required for construction of an access area on this piece of land.”
In May, unrelated to the Berlin Pond court case, the Vermont Legislature passed Act 138, making the Agency of Natural Resources (ARN) responsible for rulemaking concerning the Vermont Water Quality Standards, Vermont Wetland Rules, Vermont Use of Public Water Rules and Vermont Surface Level Rules.
“We respect the fact that this is a local issue,” Department of Fish and Wildlife Commissioner Patrick Berry said. “We have communicated with the Town Select Board that we can manage low-impact recreation and we could partner with them to make the resource accessible while protecting it. Emergency controls, such as roping off a loon nesting area, could be put in place.”
The taking of largemouth and smallmouth bass from Berlin Pond has already been restricted citing the Department’s experience that mature bass populations that have not been under fishing pressure are less wary and vulnerable to overfishing.
In a recent letter to Commissioner Berry and Department of Environmental Conservation Commissioner David Mears, the Vermont Traditions Coalition, a group of over 20
Susan Warren, head of the Lakes and Ponds section of the ANR’s Watershed Management Division, tracks Berlin Pond for aquatic invasive species. “We’ve done a lot of monitoring of Eurasian Milfoil there," she said. "It’s not abundant and it hasn’t affected the pond significantly.”
“To me, Berlin Pond is really unique,"
***
EDITORIAL FROM THE BRIDGE Pub.
I don’t see a lot of difference between fishing and bird watching. The woman with a fishing pole and the man with a pair of binoculars and a camera—while they’re doing different things outdoors, they’re often outdoors for the same reason, because of the outdoor experience. And neither those who fish nor those who enjoy birds want to trash that outdoor experience.
Let’s consider the future of Berlin Pond. I can’t believe there are too many Vermonters who would vote to see the pond trashed or who want to see the quality of the outdoor experience they prize compromised. I see at least three compelling reasons for protecting Berlin Pond.
First, Berlin Pond is the source of
Second, and this is both fortunate and lucky, for the past 100 or so years, Berlin Pond has been protected. When we visit the pond, we know we are in a special place.
Third, let’s acknowledge those special natural qualities of Berlin Pond and protect them. One of this country’s highest achievements has been setting aside places of great beauty and natural diversity and protecting them. We may not have visited all such places, but we know their names:
On Election Day (November 6), voters in the Town of
How could anyone in the abstract vote against public access and recreation? But how could anyone fail to protect the natural asset that is Berlin Pond? As wetland consultant Brad Wheeler told The Bridge, “I’ve been doing wetland and soil mapping work since the early 1980s, and I have never found a pond to be as active with wildlife as Berlin Pond. It’s really unique.”
Nobody should be prevented from visiting and enjoying Berlin Pond. But nobody should be allowed to trash the pond or lower the quality of the pond as it is. The pond should be rigorously protected.
***
The pond is a natural treasure near the historic four corners area of town. It is a large, unspoiled refuge for nesting loons, migratory birds and other wildlife. It is also a place of quiet renewal for hundreds of walkers, joggers, bird watchers and others who have enjoyed the peace and beauty of this special spot for years.
This coming election day,
The controversy that lies behind this innocuous question has generated a great deal of misinformation and mistrust. The aim of this article is to present some facts that will help
Because Berlin Pond has been protected from human interference for more than 100 years, it has become a unique sanctuary and refuge for wildlife.
Major state and federally protected wetlands encircle the pond, making it a unique natural community as it now exists.
There is no shortage of opportunities for water-based recreation in central
State law provides: “Those water bodies which currently provide wilderness-like experiences shall be managed to protect and enhance the continued availability of such experiences.” (10 VSA Sec 1424)
A “yes” vote on the “recreation” question may lead to the building of a state Fish & Wildlife access on the pond, changing its character forever, and potentially relinquishing
Such an access will inevitably require increased patrol and surveillance by
This state access would have the ability to block anyone in the state, including
Boats at access areas are proven vectors for introducing invasive species such as zebra mussels, water chestnut, and more than 20 other invasives now found in
Berlin Pond is the drinking water source for
State Senator Anthony Pollina has said: “It’s a local debate. But the bottom line is Berlin Pond is the drinking water for the City of
Vermont State Senate Candidate Jeremy Hansen states, "Yes, I do support the protection of Berlin Pond. It has been protected for 100 years - why change it now? I do hunt and fish, but I don't feel the need to hunt or fish there, as there are plenty of places nearby where I can do that."
While opponents of keeping the pond natural and pristine have tried to characterize this issue as a debate between
Berlin Town Plan 2012 states that there are 12 ecologically sensitive locations in
Berlin Pond is unique in the state, as the Audubon Society, The Berlin Conservation Commission, and
Respectfully submitted by Citizens to Protect Berlin Pond
Point of contact: maggiejkerrin@aol.com
***
Pub.
Following is my response to a mailer from “Citizens to Protect Berlin Pond” we received a couple of days ago regarding increased recreational activity in Berlin Pond.
First of all, the only land “protected” around the pond is that which is posted by the city of
Second, Berlin Pond is unique to the state only in that it’s a tremendous resource that thus far remains unavailable.
Third, it’s extremely offensive to assume everyone who might enjoy such a resource has the means to travel 20 miles to do so. Have you purchased gasoline lately?
Fourth, the Berlin Conservation Commission’s report is riddled with inaccuracies: Stratification can, and surely does, occur at depths seen in Berlin Pond; invasive species are readily transported by wading/shore birds and waterfowl; whether Montpelier’s water comes from Berlin Pond or the Winooski River, it has to go through the same treatment process; and to argue that one group of people has a right to enjoy a resource their way while excluding others from theirs is elitist and discriminatory. There’s a reason it’s against the law to interfere with those lawfully in the act of hunting and fishing — we’ve paid to preserve these places. Refer to the Pittman-Robertson Act and the Dingell-Johnson Act if you don’t know what I’m talking about.
Fifth, a state Fish and Game access will prevent unsafe situations that occur with cars parked all over the place (which was already an issue before fishing resumed this past year).
Sixth, see Title 10, 1424 section c: “The board shall attempt to manage the public waters so that the various uses may be enjoyed in a reasonable manner, in the best interests of all the citizens of the state. To the extent possible, the board shall provide for all normal uses.”
Lastly, as I explained above regarding the Conservation Commission’s report,
Keith Zandy,
***
VOTE TO PRESERVE BERLIN POND
On Nov. 6,
Virginia Renfrew
***
VOTERS TO DECIDE
ACCESS, NOT RIGHTS
Pub Virginia Renfrew makes a critical error in her Friday letter regarding the upcoming
Patrick Cashman, Shelburne