Sunday, January 26, 2014
News to Know January 26
BERLIN NEWS TO KNOW January 26, 2014
*
This communication is put together and distributed
on a volunteer basis by resident Corinne Stridsberg simply in an effort to
share information and build community, it is not from the town of Berlin .
Please
share this with your Berlin friends and
neighbors. If you're not already
receiving this news directly by email, send an email to request this to
corinnestridsberg@gmail.com.
*
Check
out the Berlin , Vermont Community News page on
facebook to find bits of current news:
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Berlin-Vermont/205922199452224
Included below please find:
WINTER TRAILS FESTIVAL FEBRUARY 1st AT GREEN MOUNTAIN CLUB
SCHOOL BOARD CANDADITE CARL PARTON
OPTION TAX IDEA ARISES AGAIN IN BERLIN
FROM FRONT PORCH FORUM - TOWN
BUDGET "EXECUTIVE SUMMARY"
*************************
Have you attended Farmers Night events at the State House
before? There is a lot of Wednesday
night fun to come this season. Check out
the schedule at this link:
http://www.leg.state.vt.us/schedule/Farmers%20Night%20Schedule%202014.pdf
***
***
Winter concert at Berlin
Elementary School will be on Thurs.,
January 30th at 6:30pm .
The monthly Parent Teacher Neighbor Association (PTNA)
meeting will be Wednesday, February 5th at 6:30pm .
Monday, February 10th from 5pm
- 6pm will be a community and parent forum to determine the skills,
knowledge and traits that Berlin
needs in its next principal.
Thursday, Feb 13th at 6pm
is Community Bullying Education Night
There will be a Talent Show on February 14th at 9:15am .
More details on these events can be found in the current
school newsletter or by calling the school at 223-2796 http://berlinschool.org/images/stories/pdfs/Current%20Newsletter.pdf
***
***
WINTER
TRAILS FESTIVAL FEBRUARY 1st AT GREEN MOUNTAIN CLUB
An event for all ages - snowshoe demos, guided snowshoe
tours, educational workshops, face painting, crafts for kids & adults,
naturalist walks, dog sled demo, winter camping/cooking clinic, S'mores, winter
animal tracking, outdoor gear displays, raffle prizes and food! More details including a schedule at
www.greenmountainclub.org Location: 4711
Waterbury-Stowe Road , Waterbury
Center Registration 8:30am - $10 general
public and kids with adults get in free.
***
***
SCHOOL
BOARD CANDADITE CARL PARTON
Carl
has turned in his petition to be on the ballot for one of the board of director
positions at Berlin Elementary School and submitted this to be shared:
My
name is Carl Parton and I am running for Berlin Elementary School Board.
I have two children that attend Berlin Elementary School . I am running for School Board for several
reasons but I do have core motivations for wanting to serve.
1) Restore local control over curriculum and spending.
2) Maximize the potential of every student, regardless
of educational competency or family socio-economic status.
3) Ensure the protection of our children’s privacy of
information and data from hackers and over-reaching national data collection
institutions including Federal governmental and private or corporately
contracted entities.
4)
Give back to my community by serving
and representing my friends and neighbors with a prioritized approach:
Quality of education for Berlin ’s
students, fiscal accountability to my neighbors for spending decisions and
support for our teachers and staff.
***
***
Annual Vermont Homestead Declaration "This form must be
filed EACH YEAR by ALL VT residents who own
and occupy a VT homestead on April 1 even if a claim for property tax
adjustment is not made."
http://www.state.vt.us/tax/pdf.word.excel/forms/income/FAQ%20Homestead%20Declaration.pdf
***
***
Good news! There will be a meeting of the Berlin
Historical Society this month. The meeting will be held at the Berlin
Town Office on Wednesday, January 29 at 7:00 PM .
The agenda for this meeting will
include:
-Traditionally the January meeting has been the time for
election of officers for the coming year. This may be delayed until a
later date.
-A review of Chapter 7 of A Place to Pass Through - A
Look at Farming in Berlin :
1850-70.
-Review of the 2013 BHS Annual Report to be published in the
Berlin Town Report.
-Update on our scrapbook project.
-The prospect of our receiving a donation of two more fire
files.
-Our upcoming potluck dinner meeting in May.
-Our participation in the 2014 Vermont History Expo in
Tunbridge.
Richard Turner
Secretary
***
***
OPTION TAX IDEA ARISES AGAIN IN BERLIN
Pub 1/25/14 Times Argus by David
Delcore
BERLIN — The Select Board in business-friendly Berlin wants to know what
local voters think about an alternative tax they have rejected once before and
which has typically inflamed the area business community.
However, with the town courting customers it needs to launch a municipal water system, board members were told during a special meeting Friday that now is not the time to call for a public vote — even a nonbinding one — on a local option tax.
“I think there is work that needs to be done first,” said Patricia McDonald, a former board member who is active in town affairs and is assisting efforts to persuade customers to commit to buying water fromBerlin .
According to McDonald, the prospect of a new tax could complicate those conversations at a crucial time — particularly given the limited public discussion of the tax idea that has occurred.
“I would be opposed to it for sure,” she said, suggesting the proposal is premature, the public is ill-informed and the concept — a 1 percent local sales tax as a new revenue source — isn’t going anywhere. “Do it at some point when it makes more sense,” she said. “There is a lot of education that needs to happen first.”
Board members initially balked, noting the idea of putting a nonbinding question on the Town Meeting Day ballot was intended as a springboard for a public conversation. According to the ballot question crafted by Selectman Jeremy Hansen, the tax would create a new funding source for the local police and volunteer fire departments.
“(Town meeting) is the right place to initiate the conversation,” Hansen said.
However, after listening to McDonald and Town Administrator Jeff Schulz, the board agreed to scrap plans for a nonbinding vote in favor of bringing the idea up under other business, along with a proposed regional public safety authority and discussion of a state bank — both initiatives the board opted not to include on the warning.
Despite the change of plans, board members are hoping town meeting provides a forum for them to explain the merits of a 1 percent sales tax that, according to Hansen’s estimates, would generate roughly $380,000 a year in new revenue. Based on their limited public discussion, board members don’t believe the local sales tax, which is already being charged in nearly a dozenVermont communities — Burlington , Williston and Rutland Town among them — would drive businesses or shoppers away.
Given the history of past alternative tax proposals in the Barre-Montpelier area, there are those who vehemently disagree. Over the past 13 years, the idea has been rejected byBerlin and Barre voters and twice defeated in Montpelier — most recently in 2012.
However, a lot of time has passed sinceBerlin voters shot down a 1 percent local option tax by a nearly
three-to-one margin in March 2001. Though the vote was decisive, the idea was
revived by officials in Berlin , Barre and Montpelier in 2004 and considered by voters in the two cities in
November of that year.
The results of those votes prompted theBerlin board to abort its plans to seek voter approval of a 1
percent additional tax on sales, rooms, meals and alcohol on Town Meeting Day
in 2005.
Montpelier voters defeated the package of taxes 2,475 to 2,023, and
Barre voters were far more emphatic: 2,871 to 781.
In each of those cases the business community, largely through the Central Vermont Chamber of Commerce, vehemently opposed what it argued was a regressive tax that would hurt existing businesses, discourage others from locating in the Barre-Montpelier area, and potentially alienate shoppers.
Those arguments resurfaced two years ago whenMontpelier separately asked voters to consider a 1 percent local
retail sales tax and a 1 percent local rooms and meals tax. The sales tax was
handily rejected, 1,739 to 827, on Town Meeting Day 2012, while the rooms and
meals tax was defeated 1,376 to 1,197.
Things have been comparatively quiet inBerlin — possibly because the board hasn’t spent much time
publicly discussing an initiative that has appeared on its published agenda
only once. That was Jan. 6, when resident Bob Wernecke — a former board member
— predicted the under-the-radar proposal needed to be thoroughly discussed.
“I think you need a lot more public input on this,” he said, sounding very much as McDonald did Friday.
“In the past we have talked about it, and it’s been a pretty negative response,” he said.
david.delcore @timesargus.com
However, with the town courting customers it needs to launch a municipal water system, board members were told during a special meeting Friday that now is not the time to call for a public vote — even a nonbinding one — on a local option tax.
“I think there is work that needs to be done first,” said Patricia McDonald, a former board member who is active in town affairs and is assisting efforts to persuade customers to commit to buying water from
According to McDonald, the prospect of a new tax could complicate those conversations at a crucial time — particularly given the limited public discussion of the tax idea that has occurred.
“I would be opposed to it for sure,” she said, suggesting the proposal is premature, the public is ill-informed and the concept — a 1 percent local sales tax as a new revenue source — isn’t going anywhere. “Do it at some point when it makes more sense,” she said. “There is a lot of education that needs to happen first.”
Board members initially balked, noting the idea of putting a nonbinding question on the Town Meeting Day ballot was intended as a springboard for a public conversation. According to the ballot question crafted by Selectman Jeremy Hansen, the tax would create a new funding source for the local police and volunteer fire departments.
“(Town meeting) is the right place to initiate the conversation,” Hansen said.
However, after listening to McDonald and Town Administrator Jeff Schulz, the board agreed to scrap plans for a nonbinding vote in favor of bringing the idea up under other business, along with a proposed regional public safety authority and discussion of a state bank — both initiatives the board opted not to include on the warning.
Despite the change of plans, board members are hoping town meeting provides a forum for them to explain the merits of a 1 percent sales tax that, according to Hansen’s estimates, would generate roughly $380,000 a year in new revenue. Based on their limited public discussion, board members don’t believe the local sales tax, which is already being charged in nearly a dozen
Given the history of past alternative tax proposals in the Barre-Montpelier area, there are those who vehemently disagree. Over the past 13 years, the idea has been rejected by
However, a lot of time has passed since
The results of those votes prompted the
In each of those cases the business community, largely through the Central Vermont Chamber of Commerce, vehemently opposed what it argued was a regressive tax that would hurt existing businesses, discourage others from locating in the Barre-Montpelier area, and potentially alienate shoppers.
Those arguments resurfaced two years ago when
Things have been comparatively quiet in
“I think you need a lot more public input on this,” he said, sounding very much as McDonald did Friday.
“In the past we have talked about it, and it’s been a pretty negative response,” he said.
david.delcore @timesargus.com
***
***
FROM BERLIN FRONT PORCH FORUM
Below is a recent posting .... there have been many more
about a variety of topics, looking for services, garage sales, meeting
announcements, events, etc. Membership
is free - to join go to: http://frontporchforum.com
2013 Budget "Executive Summary"
Jeremy Hansen • Selectboard Member ,
Berlin
Posted to: Berlin
Hi everyone! A few people have requested a more in-depth explanation and
summary of what's actually in the 2015 budget that the Selectboard has been kicking
around for a few months now. Here is my "Executive Summary" of the
nearly-final product for all of you:The proposed municipal budget ($2,526,804.36) reflects a 2.75% increase over last year's budget ($2,459,279.00). Please note that this budget is unrelated to the education budget that pays for Berlin Elementary and U32. Exactly how much this will affect next year's property tax rates is not yet clear. If (and this is a big if) we come in exactly on budget, and the grand list (essentially the total of all assessed property values in the town) stays the same, the increase would be right around 2.75%. (So if you currently pay $2000 per year, your payment would go up to about $2055.) Should we end up with a surplus or the grand list grows, that percentage would drop. If there is a deficit (which has not recently been the case) or the grand list shrinks, the percentage could be higher. This is also not factoring in any homestead credit you get from the state due to your income level, or the "Special Appropriations" that you vote on at Town Meeting which may or may not be approved.
Let me summarize some of the most noteworthy changes from last year (with the dollar amount and percentage increase/decrease from last year in parentheses)
* The Treasurer is now a full-time position. (+$14,976, +42.86%)
* The Assistant Town Clerk replaces the Office Support Staff position. (+$5,089, +50.89%)
* There's a primary election this year, which drives up the cost of ballots and election workers. (+$3,500, +116.67%)
* Not as many employees are taking advantage of the Health Insurance Buyback (-$4,500, -50.00%)
* Health insurance costs are rising, and we have more employees (not counting the Police Department) (+$6,094, +96.15%)
* The cost of ambulance service has risen (+$5,129, +7.68%)
* We will hire a new police officer 6 months into the budget year to offer 24 hour coverage over the weekends and reduce our dependence on part-timers. This figure also includes some other increases in police costs. (+$46,950, +5.65%)
* As we replace them, we will be using more expensive, but more resilient culverts (+$4,000, +66.67%)
* Forthcoming state mandates on erosion control on roads require some additional materials (+$4,000, not previously budgeted)
* Hooking up the Town Offices to the water system, not purchasing a police cruiser this year, a new highway truck, and a loan that's about to be paid off (-$66,074, -37.88%)
Obviously, these items don't add up to the whole budget, which you can still see over here:
http://bit.ly/BerlinVermontBudget2015
If you have questions that weren't answered here, please let me know and I'll do my best to get you the information.
Jeremy
279-6054
***
***
pub. 1/24/14 Times Argus by David Delcore
Proponents of that idea were
buoyed by reports from the town’s attorney, Rob Halpert, and Paul Hannan, a
surveyor from Calais . Both men said their research indicated that, due to
transactions that date back to the construction of Interstate 89 decades ago, Berlin owns perhaps half an acre of once-condemned property that
could be developed into a formal access area.
The land is a grassed-over portion
of an old road that the state relocated when the interstate was built and then
relinquished to the town after that work was complete. The land is generally
located between a parking area on Brookfield Road and a nearby concrete culvert that funnels water from the
pond under both the interstate and Paine Turnpike South.
Based on his research, Hannan said
it isn’t a question of whether Berlin owns the posted parcel but how large it is.
“It may be a little more than the
old road that you’re entitled to,” he told the board and several interested
residents.
At a minimum, Hannan and Halpert
agreed that records strongly indicate the relocated section of what was once
the original Brookfield Road belongs to Berlin
and could easily be isolated — both on the ground and on a map — without a
formal survey.
Halpert suggested that would be
the prudent next step for the board — one that he said should involve the state
Department of Fish and Wildlife given the department’s standing offer to
develop an access for outdoor enthusiasts who want to get out on the pond.
Before a 2012 Vermont Supreme Court ruling, the pond had been off-limits for
more than a century.
According to Halpert, before
incurring costs associated with his drafting a certificate of title for the
property and paying Hannan to conduct a formal survey, the board should first
confirm with the state that the location is workable.
“The goal line here is to build a
fishing access, and where that fishing access goes depends … (on) where
physically on this parcel that folks are going to actually access the water,”
he said, describing it as a logistical concern that could likely be
inexpensively addressed more than a legal issue.
“I think it would be a pretty poor
boat access if you couldn’t access (the pond) by boat,” he said.
Hannan said in an interview
Thursday that answering that question would require some surveying but not an
actual survey. He added that a review of maps on file in Berlin and Montpelier made him pretty confident the parcel has some shoreline.
“I’m pretty sure they’ve got some
water,” he said, echoing an opinion he expressed at Monday night’s board
meeting.
Halpert did suggest the board
initiate the process to re-establish and reclassify the abandoned section of
road, which he maintained is an “unidentified corridor” under the state’s
ancient roads law. Barring action by the town before July 1, 2015 , the old road would revert to adjacent property owners —
in this case Montpelier , which purchased most of the land around the pond in an
effort to protect its public drinking water supply.
As has been the case since the
Vermont Supreme Court struck down long-standing recreational restrictions on
use of the pond, opinions among residents about the prospect of a second access
were mixed.
Some urged the board to
aggressively pursue an access area at that location even though one of the
proponents suggested it probably wouldn’t be much good during the winter
because the pond rarely freezes in the vicinity of the outlet.
However, Phil Gentile wondered
whether it was worth pursuing what was described as an improved access given
the town’s inability to regulate the informal entry point near a culvert on Mirror Lake Road at the south end of the pond.
“If we develop one on this end (of
the pond) there are two access points,” Gentile said. “Don’t think they won’t
use the south end. They will.”
Gentile said board members should
consider that reality before acting. He also worried that the shallow nature of
the north end raised environmental questions that should be evaluated and
wondered whether voters should be asked if they are interested in expending
money for survey and legal work associated with a possible north end access.
Board Chairman Brad Towne said
voters spoke 2-to-1 in favor of gaining access to the pond over town property
last year. And while the town probably couldn’t stop people from getting into
the pond off Mirror
Lake Road , he
said, that access is “not ideal.”
“The least we can do is try and
make it safe,” Towne said.
The board, which has been asked
for nearly a year to impose parking restrictions on Mirror Lake Road , tabled action on a proposed solution it was told may no
longer be needed and probably didn’t make sense.
david.delcore @timesargus.com
***
***
Tuesday, January 21, 2014
News to Know January 19th, 2014
BERLIN NEWS TO KNOW January 19, 2014
*
This communication is put
together and distributed on a volunteer basis by resident Corinne Stridsberg
simply in an effort to share information and build community, it is not from
the town of Berlin .
Please share this with your Berlin friends and
neighbors. If you're not already
receiving this news directly by email, send an email to request this to
corinnestridsberg@gmail.com.
*
Check out the Berlin , Vermont Community News page
on facebook to find bits of current news:
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Berlin-Vermont/205922199452224
*************************
Notes:
On January 13th, Berlin
Elementary School did approve the
budget to go to the voters with the cuts noted in the Times Argus article on
January 7th which included reducing the hours of five staff positions at the
school (two in preschool, art, PE, and the school nurse). Only one guest attended the meeting on the
13th.
Have you seen the YouTube video of the student who did an
experiment with sweet potatoes and had trouble finding one that would
sprout? It sure gives more reasons to
buy local. I had never heard of Bud Nip
before. Here is some more information
and there is a link to the girls experiment on this page also:
http://tunnelgarden.com/potatoes-treated-with-bud-nip/
*************************
Included below please find:
SELECTBOARD MEETING MONDAY, JANUARY 20TH
TOWN REPORT GOING TO PRINT
U-32 ANNUAL REPORT
U-32 PRINCIPAL SEARCH
BERLIN PRINCIPAL
"A LIFETIME OF HELPING CHILDREN TO LOVE BOOKS"
LATIN DINNER AND DANCE
FEBRUARY 1ST
DANCE/DINNER AT CAPITAL CITY
GRANGE HALL FEBRUARY 9TH
BALLOT OR FLOOR VOTE?
PETITIONS
AT U-32, COURSES TO BE DROPPED; 4.5 JOBS CUT
*************************
SELECTBOARD
MEETING MONDAY, JANUARY 20TH
The agenda is posted on the town website
The working draft of the town budget can be found at:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AhZtU7wXy0r4dE55b0VlNHlSUS1tTDRLNWgxQzY1cXc&usp=sharing#gid=0
***
***
TOWN
REPORT GOING TO PRINT
The Town Report heads to the printer this week and is
expected back by February 14th
***
***
U-32
ANNUAL REPORT
This reports includes some introductions to some past and
current graduates which is fun to read. http://www.wcsuonline.org/images/pdf/wcsu_annual_report_2013.pdf
***
***
U-32 PRINCIPAL
SEARCH
U-32 has started the search for a new Principal. There is a
Community Forum on January 23rd at 6:30
in the Cafeteria. Please consider attending so that you can give the Search
Committee feedback on what skills and traits we want our next Principal to
have.
***
***
BERLIN
PRINCIPAL
Chris Dodge has a message to Berlin Families on the school
website:
http://berlinschool.org/
***
***
"A
LIFETIME OF HELPING CHILDREN TO LOVE BOOKS"
Be sure to take the time to go cut and paste this link
http://www.ourherald.com/news/2014-01-09/Front_Page/A_Lifetime_of_Helping_Children_To_Love_Books.html
to find out what being the "Youth Services Consultant
for the VT Dept. of Libraries" has meant to all the libraries and all the
youth during the past 28 years... thanks to Berlin 's
Grace Greene. Congratulations on your
upcoming retirement Grace!
***
***
Coming up the last Saturday of January, the annual ice
harvest in Brookfield . I believe
the start time is 10:30am although
I'd get there a bit early. Happened to find a YouTube video of it when
mentioning it to somebody, be sure to check it out if you haven't been or even
if you have! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNgGoBqfCW4
***
***
LATIN
DINNER AND DANCE FEBRUARY 1ST
If you enjoy Mexican Food and Latin Music please join us on Saturday, February 1, 2014
at U-32 for the Latin Dinner and Dance. Dinner served at 6:30 followed by salsa dance lessons
and live music!
Adults $15 Students $7 Family (immediate only) $35
Tickets can be purchased at the door or in advance from music students or by contacting Sara at 229-0321 x5179 or swolf@u32.org
Adults $15 Students $7 Family (immediate only) $35
Tickets can be purchased at the door or in advance from music students or by contacting Sara at 229-0321 x5179 or swolf@u32.org
***
***
DANCE/DINNER
AT CAPITAL CITY GRANGE HALL FEBRUARY 9TH
Sunday, February 9. Heat up the dance hall to benefit the
Friends of the Capital City Grange as they work to fund fire code improvements.
Bring friends and little ones to the family dance from 3:00pm – 4:30pm with music by Mikaela Moore and Dana Hartshorn.
Stay for an amazing Thai dinner from 4:30pm –
5:30pm . Follow it up with a contra dance, 5:30 pm - 8:30pm with music by Maivish (Jaige Trudel and
Adam Broome) and calling by Mary Wesley.
No partner needed, bring clean, soft-soled shoes. Capital City
Grange Hall, 6612 VT Route
12, Berlin . Adults: $10 to dance,
$10 to eat. Children under 16: $5/$5. A fantastic event for beginner and
advanced dancers alike!
***
***
BALLOT OR FLOOR VOTE?
Ballot
or Floor Vote? (Town and School Budgets)
By: Carl Parton- School Board Member
The
issue of whether to have Berlin Town and School Budget votes on the ballot or on the floor
during Town Meeting Day is bursting with strategic importance for budget
supporters and budget adversaries.
I am
of the opinion that budget supporters want the budgets to be voted on the floor
because it is more difficult for most people to speak out against or even
openly vote against the budget with all of their neighbors scrutinizing and
judging them on their vote. The tendency for most people is to go with
the majority vote, which historically has been to approve most budgets with few
or no changes. The budget supporters can typically rally supporters to
attend the votes on Town Meeting Day and they have time during debate to justify
the budget with presentations given by budget supporters and administrative
officials that have facts and figures and abundant preparation time to make a
convincing defense.
The
primary advantage for a floor vote that both supporters and opponents might
agree on is that changes or amendments to the budget can be proposed and made
during the discussion of the budget within the floor vote process.
Because of this, the voters that are able to attend Town Meeting can have
a lot of direct influence on budgets.
Budget
opponents, taxpayers that want more fiscal restraint shown, prefer an
Australian ballot vote where they can vote with anonymity and without any
pressure of social repercussions for their vote. Budget
opponents feel that a more free and honest representation of public sentiment
is displayed in a ballot vote. They also present the fact that more
voters get to participate in the voting process in a ballot vote that lasts
from 10 AM to 7PM and could
be voted on with an absentee ballot rather than a floor vote within a day time
meeting that one must attend in order to enjoy enfranchisement. Many
voters are unable to attend Town Meeting due to vacations, work, daycare
limitations, health issues or a number of other impediments.
I
think allowing the maximum number of voters possible to make the decision
regarding the method of the Town and School budget votes is the most fair and
just approach. If the majority of voters want a floor vote or a
ballot vote than their wishes should be honored each year.
I propose that each year the School budget ballot and the
Town budget ballot have ballot articles offering the option of which type of
votes (floor or ballot) they want for the following Town Meeting election
cycle. Every year voters would be empowered to decide how they will
celebrate the democratic process for the following year, thus maximizing the
influence of public sentiment on how we as a Town govern and decide important
issues that affect our lives.
***
***
PETITIONS
In addition to the petitions mentioned previously that are
out with signatures being gathered:
Jeremy Hansen who is running for re-election to the
selectboard.
Ture Nelson who is running for re-election to the
selectboard.
Rosemary Morse who is running for re-election to the Town
Clerk position.
the following folks also have petitions:
Pete Kelley who is running for re-election to the
selectboard
Carl Parton who is running for election to the school board
(he was appointed to the seat he is now in when a board member resigned)
George Gross who is running for election to the school board
Note there are four school board seats up for election in
March. There is still time to pick up a petition and get the required
signatures to become a candidate for any of the positions up for election. Personally, I always appreciate it when there are
multiple candidates for a position in order to give people a choice and to have
some discussion as to what the people running would bring to the position. Nineteen valid signatures are needed and the petition
must be turned in to the Town Clerk by January 27th. Feel free to stop by the Town Clerk's office
if you'd like to pick up a petition to gather signatures on, or to sign any of
the petitions.
If you're a candidate for one of the positions and would like
to share any information about yourself and why you're running / what you can
bring to the position. Please feel free
to send it along to me.
***
***
AT U-32, COURSES TO BE DROPPED; 4.5 JOBS CUT
AT U-32, COURSES TO BE DROPPED; 4.5 JOBS CUT
Pub. 1/10/14 Times Argus by
David Delcore
It took three hours, split the school board down the middle and ultimately required Chairwoman Adrienne Magida to cast a tie-breaking vote before stating the obvious.
“We have a budget,” a visibly drained Magida declared immediately after the board voted 4-3 to approve nearly $280,000 in staff-related cuts to a budget that voters in
When the meeting began the budget stood at $15.1 million, an administrative proposal to cut more than $450,000 in personnel was on the table, and a decent-sized crowd — some teachers, some taxpayers, some both — was gathered in the auditorium.
What followed was a spirited debate, a good bit of second-guessing, some compromise, and the narrow adoption of a budget with a $14,833,463 bottom line that required a brief recess to confirm.
Business Manager Lori Bibeau, who spent much of the evening tapping the keys of her calculator with one hand while holding a flashlight with the other, didn’t want to take any chances when it appeared the board was lurching toward a divided but decisive vote. Sensing Bibeau’s concern, Superintendent Bill Kimball requested a brief break and left the auditorium with her and Principal Keith Gerritt before returning to announce the impact of an amendment that was proposed by board member Emily Goyette and approved 6-1.
That vote, on Goyette’s request to restore $12,430 for two chronically under-enrolled advanced foreign language courses, represented a rare moment of consensus. The board, like the audience, clearly was of two minds when it came to cutting a budget that at the outset of the meeting reflected an increase of just over $1 million, or nearly 7.2 percent.
While most agreed that those numbers, and an accompanying 4 percent spike in taxes, were excessive and none liked the prospect of cutting staff, they were split over how to respond to a proposal that would do just that.
Crafted by Gerritt at the board’s request, the proposal contemplated the elimination of four full-time teachers, the equivalent of a fifth, a special educator, a paraprofessional and 50 percent of one of the school’s two librarian positions.
Gerritt, who announced midmeeting that he will be retiring at the end of the year, said he didn’t like the proposal any more than the board and many in the audience did, but didn’t see the point in kicking the can down the road.
“There’s no more blood in the stone, folks. Whatever you decide, it’s going to hurt,” he said, predicting if he was tasked with coming up with an alternative it would attract a different room full of equally disgruntled people.
“I don’t really have any other good recommendations,” he said.
Gerritt’s observation came on a night that saw some question whether it was really worth cutting staff to save the average taxpayer $30 per $100 of assessed property value, notwithstanding the fact that all five towns are facing sharp increases that are beyond the U-32 board’s control. Others openly worried that failing to make a meaningful cut would accelerate what they perceived as eroding support for the high school budget and potentially lead to its failure.
Though Gerritt proposed cutting four middle school teachers, he began nudging the board toward compromise when he suggested they consider keeping two of them and restoring some of the under-enrolled high school courses he’d targeted for reduction.
Board member Conrad Smith embraced that proposal, offering a motion that the board cut two of the four middle school teachers in question, a special educator, a paraprofessional, half of the librarian position and four high school courses — marine biology, metalsmithing, French 5 and Spanish 5.
Though board members Kari Bradley, Jonathon Goddard and Katie Winkeljohn said they could not support what they viewed as a premature plan to cut staff, fellow member Mike Law said the cuts were regrettable but necessary.
“I’m not comfortable cutting any positions, but I don’t see us sustaining this year after year,” he said.
Goyette joined Law and Smith after her amendment to spare the two foreign language courses passed.
Bradley urged the board to defer the recommended staffing cuts until after it had been presented with a plan to restructure the middle school program. He suggested the board cut $89,000 in newly proposed expenses, as well as $100,000 from the capital budget for the school as a stopgap measure.
Bradley further suggested the board could buy time by adopting a reduced budget and deciding what to actually cut at a later date.
Magida said that would be a mistake.
“I think we owe it to the public to make the final decision on our budget tonight,” she said, citing the looming deadline to get the details of the budget published in the annual reports in all five towns.
Those reports, Magida said, were a valuable way to communicate the content of the budget with voters, and missing the publishing deadline would be a mistake.
“It is in our best interest to make a decision tonight and get it out there,” she said.
That’s what the board did, approving a $14.8 million budget that reflects $732,389 in new spending — an increase of 5.2 percent. Based on the board’s subsequent decision to use $200,000 of $300,000 in available surplus funds as a source of revenue in the budget, the net tax impact of the spending plan is an increase of $455,491, or 3.94 percent.
david.delcore @timesargus.com
***
***
Wednesday, January 08, 2014
News to Know January 8th
BERLIN NEWS TO KNOW January 8, 2014
*
This communication is put
together and distributed on a volunteer basis by resident Corinne Stridsberg
simply in an effort to share information and build community, it is not from
the town of Berlin .
Please share this with your Berlin friends and neighbors. If you're not already receiving this news
directly by email, send an email to request this to
corinnestridsberg@gmail.com.
*
Check out the Berlin , Vermont Community News page
on facebook to find bits of current news: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Berlin-Vermont/205922199452224
*************************
Notes:
Please note there is a lot of information here to digest and a couple
of very important meetings regarding school budgets, one tonight at U-32 and
the other at Berlin Elementary School on Monday.
*************************
Included below please find:
PETITIONS
TOWN MEETING
U-32
SCHOOL BOARD SHARPENS THE AX
***
PETITIONS
Please note there are several petitions currently
circulating in town. Some folks have
asked to have a copy available on the counter at the Town Clerk's office for
your convenience. At the moment there
are ones for:
Jeremy Hansen who is running for re-election to the
selectboard.
Ture Nelson who is running for re-election to the
selectboard.
Rosemary Morse who is running for re-election to the Town
Clerk position.
There is one petition asking for funding requests for four
agencies be added to the warning. These
four agencies are: Prevent Child Abuse Vermont ;
Central Vermont Home Health and Hospice; Just Basics, Inc.; and Montpelier Senior Activity Center
There are also petitions to have the Town and School
District budgets go back to a floor vote. Please note that this vote will be a floor
vote since it's not a budget item.
Are there any other petitions circulating? I would be glad to share that information
with others. To date no petitions have
gone out for anybody to run for the open Berlin Elementary School Board of
Directors positions. Four of the five
seats will be on the ballot.
TOWN MEETING
Town
Meeting is Tuesday, March 4th 10am at Berlin Elementary School .
Australian Ballot Voting 10am – 7pm .
Absentee ballots are available
from the Town Clerk, these can be requested by phone or mail. Any absentee ballot request to be mailed needs
to be made by the Thursday before Town Meeting and must be received back no
later than when the polls close Tuesday evening (received in the mail on or
before 3/4/14, or delivered to the Town Office or to polling officials located
at the school that day).
Petitions for Town Meeting which is on Tuesday, March 4th:
Petitions
asking for a funding amount to be on the Warning must be submitted to the Town
Clerk with the required signatures by 3:30pm on Thursday,
January 23rd. For funding petitions, 5% of
the registered voters must sign the petition.
The checklist has about 1900 people on it, which makes the current
requirement 95 signatures. Please
get more signatures than required in case there are any duplicates or otherwise
invalid signatures.
Petitions
that are for candidates running for an office or to be on a board must be
submitted to the Town Clerk with the required signatures by 3:30pm on Monday, January 27th. Candidates need just 1% (or currently 19) of
registered voters to sign their petition.
Please get more signatures than required in case there are any
duplicates or otherwise invalid signatures.
If
you decide to become a Write-in candidate, you need to be a registered voter
and you must receive a minimum of 30 votes or 1% of registered voters whichever
is less. When there are multiple people
with write-in votes for the same position, to be elected the candidate must
receive at least the 1% minimum and then it's whoever receives the most votes. If nobody has received the 1% minimum, nobody
is elected.
For more details regarding registering to vote, call the Berlin
Town Clerk 229-9298 or go the Secretary
of State’s website: http://vermont-elections.org/elections1/registertovote.html
Meetings are held at the Berlin Town Office on Shed
Road unless otherwise noted:
Select Board 1st and 3rd
Mondays, 7pm
In
Learning Center (library)
Sewer Commission 2nd and 4th
Mondays, 7pm
Development Review Board 1st and 3rd
Tuesday, 7pm
Conservation
Committee every
other first Wed. of the month from Sept. to May
and Recreation Committee (Sept,
Nov, Jan, Mar, May)
Planning Commission 2nd and 4th
Wednesday, 7pm
U-32 High School Board 2nd and 4th
Wednesday at U-32, 6pm in
Room 131
Emergency Mgmt Team 2nd Thursday, 6pm at fire station
Water Supply Committee Currently meeting as needed
Cemetery Commission Currently meeting as needed
Capital Budget Committee Currently
meeting as needed
Economic Dev. Committee Currently
inactive
Meeting dates are subject to change. For meetings where a large turn-out is
anticipated, those meetings are apt to be scheduled to take place at the
elementary school.
***
***
NOTE: Next
Board meeting is Monday, January 13th 6pm
Pub. 1/7/14
Times Argus by David Delcore
Though board members won’t formally adopt the budget request that will appear on the Town Meeting Day ballot in March until their regular meeting Monday, they have reluctantly signed off on an administrative proposal that targets portions of five positions without eliminating any of them.
The spread-the-pain approach preserves the full range of services currently provided at
Chairwoman Vera Frazier credited Superintendent Bill Kimball and Principal Chris Dodge for doing precisely what the board asked, while expressing misgivings about how they trimmed the budget’s tax increase, which now stands at 3.96 percent.
“This wouldn’t be my preference for cuts,” Frazier said of position-specific reductions to the preschool, physical education and art programs, as well as to the school nurse’s position.
Frazier wasn’t alone.
Board member Carl Parton said the proposed staff cuts were troubling.
“It’s a loss to our kids to make those cuts,” he said. “It’s a loss to the people who deliver services to our kids.”
“It really sucks,” she said.
Kimball didn’t argue, assuring the board that he had combed through the budget with Dodge in an effort to find money to restore one or more of the staffing cuts and concluded that, while it was mathematically possible, it probably wasn’t responsible.
“You probably wouldn’t have paper through the year,” he said, suggesting the board would have to cut a lot of supplies to offset forgoing any of the proposed reductions.
The plan advanced by Kimball would require modifying the preschool program to reflect a 40 percent reduction in the full-time instructor’s position and a 30 percent reduction to a support staff position.
The combined savings would be just over $36,000.
Both the school nurse’s position and the physical education teacher’s position would essentially be reduced from five to four days a week for a savings of $18,644 and $16,400, respectively, and the art teacher’s position would be reduced from four to three days a week for a savings of $13,331.
Based on those cuts and several previously approved budget adjustments, the board is prepared to ask voters to spend $3,264,790 to operate the local school system. That’s an increase of slightly less than $99,000, or about 3.1 percent, over the $3,166,235 budget that voters approved in March. Voters rejected a supplemental request for $100,655 that same day.
The result of the latter vote wasn’t lost on board members, who complained about what they characterized as frustratingly low parent turnout on Town Meeting Day and acknowledged the budget-building process was a balancing act.
“We feel like we’re threading the needle with a long chain, and it’s tough to do,” said Chris Rice.
Rice said the staff reductions were regrettable but necessary to bring the tax increase associated with the proposed budget below 4 percent.
“Given what we saw last year and what we all hear anecdotally at the grocery store … I think that (4 percent) is as good a target as any,” he said. “I hope it passes.”
Board members and teachers who attended the special meeting brainstormed about what they might do to boost turnout and agreed to explore the possibility of registering voters at a school concert this month.
However, Parton suggested school boosters might be better served by focusing on “inspiration not registration.”
“(Parents) are on the voter checklist. They’re just not voting,” he said.
@Tagline:david.delcore @timesargus.com
***
***
NOTE: board meeting tonight Wed. Jan 8 at 6pm )
U-32 SCHOOL BOARD SHARPENS THE AX
pub. by
Times Argus on 1/6/14 by David Delcore
EAST MONTPELIER –— The U-32 School Board is
poised to consider an administrative proposal to cut as many as four full-time
teachers, the equivalent of a fifth, a special educator, a paraprofessional and
50 percent of one of the school’s two librarian positions when it meets
Wednesday night.
The proposed staffing cuts total just over $450,000 and would represent a net savings of more than $390,000 once revenue that would be lost, if some of the positions are eliminated, is factored into the equation.
The board has already made a series of cuts, trimming the 10 percent spending increase reflected in the first draft of the budget for the junior-senior high school, which serves students from Berlin, Calais, East Montpelier, Middlesex and Worcester, to just over 7 percent.
That’s where things stand heading into Wednesday’s 6 p.m. meeting.
The budget’s bottom line now sits at $15.1 million — $1 million more than the $14.1 million figure that voters in the five-town union high school district collectively approved last March. Barring further reductions the tax impact of the proposed budget would be an increase of about 4.1 percent
That’s higher than school officials would like, prompting the prioritized list of staffing reductions that was prepared for the board’s consideration.
Most of the proposed cuts involve a junior high school program that, due to declining enrollment, has unusually low class sizes.
According to school officials there are 12 students in the average seventh- and eighth-grade classes at U-32. That number, they said, would jump up to 19 if the board approves all of the staff reductions that have been proposed.
Those cuts include one of six junior high school math teachers, three of nine “core” teachers responsible for students in seventh and eighth grades, as well as a special educator and full-time paraprofessional.
Only some of those positions — the math teacher, one of the core teachers, the special educator and the paraprofessional — are included in the top tier of cuts that would result in a net savings of about $175,000 and bring the tax impact of the budget just below 3 percent.
The administrative proposal suggests the board consider cutting half of a librarian’s position ($31,075) and the equivalent of a full-time teaching position by targeting high school classes with low enrollment ($62,150), before cutting an additional two core teachers from the junior high school ($124,300).
If all of the cuts are approved the U-32 spending increase would drop just below 4 percent and the tax impact of the budget would be an increase of roughly 1.3 percent.
That would shave between 2.6 and 3.2 cents off projected tax rate hikes in all five communities. Based on soon-to-be-finalized elementary school budgets those rate hikes range from a low of 10.7 cents inBerlin to a high of 24.8 cents
in Calais .
East Montpelier is looking at an 18.2-cent rate hike if nothing changes at U-32 Wednesday night, while the increase in Middlesex and Worcester have been tentatively pegged at 15.5 cents and 17.8 cents respectively.
Those figures are based on soon-to-be-finalized elementary school budgets and were recently adjusted to reflect changes to the common level of appraisal (CLA) in all five communities.
Though the CLA, a calculation the state uses to equalize the tax burden in allVermont towns, remained
relatively stable in East Montpelier , Middlesex and Worcester , it rose nearly 3.4
percent in Berlin and dropped almost 6
percent in Calais .
The overnight effect trimmed roughly 5.2 cents from the projected rate hike inBerlin and added 10.9 cents to
the projected rate increase in Calais .
david.delcore@timesargus.com
The proposed staffing cuts total just over $450,000 and would represent a net savings of more than $390,000 once revenue that would be lost, if some of the positions are eliminated, is factored into the equation.
The board has already made a series of cuts, trimming the 10 percent spending increase reflected in the first draft of the budget for the junior-senior high school, which serves students from Berlin, Calais, East Montpelier, Middlesex and Worcester, to just over 7 percent.
That’s where things stand heading into Wednesday’s 6 p.m. meeting.
The budget’s bottom line now sits at $15.1 million — $1 million more than the $14.1 million figure that voters in the five-town union high school district collectively approved last March. Barring further reductions the tax impact of the proposed budget would be an increase of about 4.1 percent
That’s higher than school officials would like, prompting the prioritized list of staffing reductions that was prepared for the board’s consideration.
Most of the proposed cuts involve a junior high school program that, due to declining enrollment, has unusually low class sizes.
According to school officials there are 12 students in the average seventh- and eighth-grade classes at U-32. That number, they said, would jump up to 19 if the board approves all of the staff reductions that have been proposed.
Those cuts include one of six junior high school math teachers, three of nine “core” teachers responsible for students in seventh and eighth grades, as well as a special educator and full-time paraprofessional.
Only some of those positions — the math teacher, one of the core teachers, the special educator and the paraprofessional — are included in the top tier of cuts that would result in a net savings of about $175,000 and bring the tax impact of the budget just below 3 percent.
The administrative proposal suggests the board consider cutting half of a librarian’s position ($31,075) and the equivalent of a full-time teaching position by targeting high school classes with low enrollment ($62,150), before cutting an additional two core teachers from the junior high school ($124,300).
If all of the cuts are approved the U-32 spending increase would drop just below 4 percent and the tax impact of the budget would be an increase of roughly 1.3 percent.
That would shave between 2.6 and 3.2 cents off projected tax rate hikes in all five communities. Based on soon-to-be-finalized elementary school budgets those rate hikes range from a low of 10.7 cents in
East Montpelier is looking at an 18.2-cent rate hike if nothing changes at U-32 Wednesday night, while the increase in Middlesex and Worcester have been tentatively pegged at 15.5 cents and 17.8 cents respectively.
Those figures are based on soon-to-be-finalized elementary school budgets and were recently adjusted to reflect changes to the common level of appraisal (CLA) in all five communities.
Though the CLA, a calculation the state uses to equalize the tax burden in all
The overnight effect trimmed roughly 5.2 cents from the projected rate hike in
david.delcore@timesargus.com