Sunday, January 26, 2014
News to Know January 26
BERLIN NEWS TO KNOW January 26, 2014
*
This communication is put together and distributed
on a volunteer basis by resident Corinne Stridsberg simply in an effort to
share information and build community, it is not from the town of Berlin .
Please
share this with your Berlin friends and
neighbors. If you're not already
receiving this news directly by email, send an email to request this to
corinnestridsberg@gmail.com.
*
Check
out the Berlin , Vermont Community News page on
facebook to find bits of current news:
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Berlin-Vermont/205922199452224
Included below please find:
WINTER TRAILS FESTIVAL FEBRUARY 1st AT GREEN MOUNTAIN CLUB
SCHOOL BOARD CANDADITE CARL PARTON
OPTION TAX IDEA ARISES AGAIN IN BERLIN
FROM FRONT PORCH FORUM - TOWN
BUDGET "EXECUTIVE SUMMARY"
*************************
Have you attended Farmers Night events at the State House
before? There is a lot of Wednesday
night fun to come this season. Check out
the schedule at this link:
http://www.leg.state.vt.us/schedule/Farmers%20Night%20Schedule%202014.pdf
***
***
Winter concert at Berlin
Elementary School will be on Thurs.,
January 30th at 6:30pm .
The monthly Parent Teacher Neighbor Association (PTNA)
meeting will be Wednesday, February 5th at 6:30pm .
Monday, February 10th from 5pm
- 6pm will be a community and parent forum to determine the skills,
knowledge and traits that Berlin
needs in its next principal.
Thursday, Feb 13th at 6pm
is Community Bullying Education Night
There will be a Talent Show on February 14th at 9:15am .
More details on these events can be found in the current
school newsletter or by calling the school at 223-2796 http://berlinschool.org/images/stories/pdfs/Current%20Newsletter.pdf
***
***
WINTER
TRAILS FESTIVAL FEBRUARY 1st AT GREEN MOUNTAIN CLUB
An event for all ages - snowshoe demos, guided snowshoe
tours, educational workshops, face painting, crafts for kids & adults,
naturalist walks, dog sled demo, winter camping/cooking clinic, S'mores, winter
animal tracking, outdoor gear displays, raffle prizes and food! More details including a schedule at
www.greenmountainclub.org Location: 4711
Waterbury-Stowe Road , Waterbury
Center Registration 8:30am - $10 general
public and kids with adults get in free.
***
***
SCHOOL
BOARD CANDADITE CARL PARTON
Carl
has turned in his petition to be on the ballot for one of the board of director
positions at Berlin Elementary School and submitted this to be shared:
My
name is Carl Parton and I am running for Berlin Elementary School Board.
I have two children that attend Berlin Elementary School . I am running for School Board for several
reasons but I do have core motivations for wanting to serve.
1) Restore local control over curriculum and spending.
2) Maximize the potential of every student, regardless
of educational competency or family socio-economic status.
3) Ensure the protection of our children’s privacy of
information and data from hackers and over-reaching national data collection
institutions including Federal governmental and private or corporately
contracted entities.
4)
Give back to my community by serving
and representing my friends and neighbors with a prioritized approach:
Quality of education for Berlin ’s
students, fiscal accountability to my neighbors for spending decisions and
support for our teachers and staff.
***
***
Annual Vermont Homestead Declaration "This form must be
filed EACH YEAR by ALL VT residents who own
and occupy a VT homestead on April 1 even if a claim for property tax
adjustment is not made."
http://www.state.vt.us/tax/pdf.word.excel/forms/income/FAQ%20Homestead%20Declaration.pdf
***
***
Good news! There will be a meeting of the Berlin
Historical Society this month. The meeting will be held at the Berlin
Town Office on Wednesday, January 29 at 7:00 PM .
The agenda for this meeting will
include:
-Traditionally the January meeting has been the time for
election of officers for the coming year. This may be delayed until a
later date.
-A review of Chapter 7 of A Place to Pass Through - A
Look at Farming in Berlin :
1850-70.
-Review of the 2013 BHS Annual Report to be published in the
Berlin Town Report.
-Update on our scrapbook project.
-The prospect of our receiving a donation of two more fire
files.
-Our upcoming potluck dinner meeting in May.
-Our participation in the 2014 Vermont History Expo in
Tunbridge.
Richard Turner
Secretary
***
***
OPTION TAX IDEA ARISES AGAIN IN BERLIN
Pub 1/25/14 Times Argus by David
Delcore
BERLIN — The Select Board in business-friendly Berlin wants to know what
local voters think about an alternative tax they have rejected once before and
which has typically inflamed the area business community.
However, with the town courting customers it needs to launch a municipal water system, board members were told during a special meeting Friday that now is not the time to call for a public vote — even a nonbinding one — on a local option tax.
“I think there is work that needs to be done first,” said Patricia McDonald, a former board member who is active in town affairs and is assisting efforts to persuade customers to commit to buying water fromBerlin .
According to McDonald, the prospect of a new tax could complicate those conversations at a crucial time — particularly given the limited public discussion of the tax idea that has occurred.
“I would be opposed to it for sure,” she said, suggesting the proposal is premature, the public is ill-informed and the concept — a 1 percent local sales tax as a new revenue source — isn’t going anywhere. “Do it at some point when it makes more sense,” she said. “There is a lot of education that needs to happen first.”
Board members initially balked, noting the idea of putting a nonbinding question on the Town Meeting Day ballot was intended as a springboard for a public conversation. According to the ballot question crafted by Selectman Jeremy Hansen, the tax would create a new funding source for the local police and volunteer fire departments.
“(Town meeting) is the right place to initiate the conversation,” Hansen said.
However, after listening to McDonald and Town Administrator Jeff Schulz, the board agreed to scrap plans for a nonbinding vote in favor of bringing the idea up under other business, along with a proposed regional public safety authority and discussion of a state bank — both initiatives the board opted not to include on the warning.
Despite the change of plans, board members are hoping town meeting provides a forum for them to explain the merits of a 1 percent sales tax that, according to Hansen’s estimates, would generate roughly $380,000 a year in new revenue. Based on their limited public discussion, board members don’t believe the local sales tax, which is already being charged in nearly a dozenVermont communities — Burlington , Williston and Rutland Town among them — would drive businesses or shoppers away.
Given the history of past alternative tax proposals in the Barre-Montpelier area, there are those who vehemently disagree. Over the past 13 years, the idea has been rejected byBerlin and Barre voters and twice defeated in Montpelier — most recently in 2012.
However, a lot of time has passed sinceBerlin voters shot down a 1 percent local option tax by a nearly
three-to-one margin in March 2001. Though the vote was decisive, the idea was
revived by officials in Berlin , Barre and Montpelier in 2004 and considered by voters in the two cities in
November of that year.
The results of those votes prompted theBerlin board to abort its plans to seek voter approval of a 1
percent additional tax on sales, rooms, meals and alcohol on Town Meeting Day
in 2005.
Montpelier voters defeated the package of taxes 2,475 to 2,023, and
Barre voters were far more emphatic: 2,871 to 781.
In each of those cases the business community, largely through the Central Vermont Chamber of Commerce, vehemently opposed what it argued was a regressive tax that would hurt existing businesses, discourage others from locating in the Barre-Montpelier area, and potentially alienate shoppers.
Those arguments resurfaced two years ago whenMontpelier separately asked voters to consider a 1 percent local
retail sales tax and a 1 percent local rooms and meals tax. The sales tax was
handily rejected, 1,739 to 827, on Town Meeting Day 2012, while the rooms and
meals tax was defeated 1,376 to 1,197.
Things have been comparatively quiet inBerlin — possibly because the board hasn’t spent much time
publicly discussing an initiative that has appeared on its published agenda
only once. That was Jan. 6, when resident Bob Wernecke — a former board member
— predicted the under-the-radar proposal needed to be thoroughly discussed.
“I think you need a lot more public input on this,” he said, sounding very much as McDonald did Friday.
“In the past we have talked about it, and it’s been a pretty negative response,” he said.
david.delcore @timesargus.com
However, with the town courting customers it needs to launch a municipal water system, board members were told during a special meeting Friday that now is not the time to call for a public vote — even a nonbinding one — on a local option tax.
“I think there is work that needs to be done first,” said Patricia McDonald, a former board member who is active in town affairs and is assisting efforts to persuade customers to commit to buying water from
According to McDonald, the prospect of a new tax could complicate those conversations at a crucial time — particularly given the limited public discussion of the tax idea that has occurred.
“I would be opposed to it for sure,” she said, suggesting the proposal is premature, the public is ill-informed and the concept — a 1 percent local sales tax as a new revenue source — isn’t going anywhere. “Do it at some point when it makes more sense,” she said. “There is a lot of education that needs to happen first.”
Board members initially balked, noting the idea of putting a nonbinding question on the Town Meeting Day ballot was intended as a springboard for a public conversation. According to the ballot question crafted by Selectman Jeremy Hansen, the tax would create a new funding source for the local police and volunteer fire departments.
“(Town meeting) is the right place to initiate the conversation,” Hansen said.
However, after listening to McDonald and Town Administrator Jeff Schulz, the board agreed to scrap plans for a nonbinding vote in favor of bringing the idea up under other business, along with a proposed regional public safety authority and discussion of a state bank — both initiatives the board opted not to include on the warning.
Despite the change of plans, board members are hoping town meeting provides a forum for them to explain the merits of a 1 percent sales tax that, according to Hansen’s estimates, would generate roughly $380,000 a year in new revenue. Based on their limited public discussion, board members don’t believe the local sales tax, which is already being charged in nearly a dozen
Given the history of past alternative tax proposals in the Barre-Montpelier area, there are those who vehemently disagree. Over the past 13 years, the idea has been rejected by
However, a lot of time has passed since
The results of those votes prompted the
In each of those cases the business community, largely through the Central Vermont Chamber of Commerce, vehemently opposed what it argued was a regressive tax that would hurt existing businesses, discourage others from locating in the Barre-Montpelier area, and potentially alienate shoppers.
Those arguments resurfaced two years ago when
Things have been comparatively quiet in
“I think you need a lot more public input on this,” he said, sounding very much as McDonald did Friday.
“In the past we have talked about it, and it’s been a pretty negative response,” he said.
david.delcore @timesargus.com
***
***
FROM BERLIN FRONT PORCH FORUM
Below is a recent posting .... there have been many more
about a variety of topics, looking for services, garage sales, meeting
announcements, events, etc. Membership
is free - to join go to: http://frontporchforum.com
2013 Budget "Executive Summary"
Jeremy Hansen • Selectboard Member ,
Berlin
Posted to: Berlin
Hi everyone! A few people have requested a more in-depth explanation and
summary of what's actually in the 2015 budget that the Selectboard has been kicking
around for a few months now. Here is my "Executive Summary" of the
nearly-final product for all of you:The proposed municipal budget ($2,526,804.36) reflects a 2.75% increase over last year's budget ($2,459,279.00). Please note that this budget is unrelated to the education budget that pays for Berlin Elementary and U32. Exactly how much this will affect next year's property tax rates is not yet clear. If (and this is a big if) we come in exactly on budget, and the grand list (essentially the total of all assessed property values in the town) stays the same, the increase would be right around 2.75%. (So if you currently pay $2000 per year, your payment would go up to about $2055.) Should we end up with a surplus or the grand list grows, that percentage would drop. If there is a deficit (which has not recently been the case) or the grand list shrinks, the percentage could be higher. This is also not factoring in any homestead credit you get from the state due to your income level, or the "Special Appropriations" that you vote on at Town Meeting which may or may not be approved.
Let me summarize some of the most noteworthy changes from last year (with the dollar amount and percentage increase/decrease from last year in parentheses)
* The Treasurer is now a full-time position. (+$14,976, +42.86%)
* The Assistant Town Clerk replaces the Office Support Staff position. (+$5,089, +50.89%)
* There's a primary election this year, which drives up the cost of ballots and election workers. (+$3,500, +116.67%)
* Not as many employees are taking advantage of the Health Insurance Buyback (-$4,500, -50.00%)
* Health insurance costs are rising, and we have more employees (not counting the Police Department) (+$6,094, +96.15%)
* The cost of ambulance service has risen (+$5,129, +7.68%)
* We will hire a new police officer 6 months into the budget year to offer 24 hour coverage over the weekends and reduce our dependence on part-timers. This figure also includes some other increases in police costs. (+$46,950, +5.65%)
* As we replace them, we will be using more expensive, but more resilient culverts (+$4,000, +66.67%)
* Forthcoming state mandates on erosion control on roads require some additional materials (+$4,000, not previously budgeted)
* Hooking up the Town Offices to the water system, not purchasing a police cruiser this year, a new highway truck, and a loan that's about to be paid off (-$66,074, -37.88%)
Obviously, these items don't add up to the whole budget, which you can still see over here:
http://bit.ly/BerlinVermontBudget2015
If you have questions that weren't answered here, please let me know and I'll do my best to get you the information.
Jeremy
279-6054
***
***
pub. 1/24/14 Times Argus by David Delcore
Proponents of that idea were
buoyed by reports from the town’s attorney, Rob Halpert, and Paul Hannan, a
surveyor from Calais . Both men said their research indicated that, due to
transactions that date back to the construction of Interstate 89 decades ago, Berlin owns perhaps half an acre of once-condemned property that
could be developed into a formal access area.
The land is a grassed-over portion
of an old road that the state relocated when the interstate was built and then
relinquished to the town after that work was complete. The land is generally
located between a parking area on Brookfield Road and a nearby concrete culvert that funnels water from the
pond under both the interstate and Paine Turnpike South.
Based on his research, Hannan said
it isn’t a question of whether Berlin owns the posted parcel but how large it is.
“It may be a little more than the
old road that you’re entitled to,” he told the board and several interested
residents.
At a minimum, Hannan and Halpert
agreed that records strongly indicate the relocated section of what was once
the original Brookfield Road belongs to Berlin
and could easily be isolated — both on the ground and on a map — without a
formal survey.
Halpert suggested that would be
the prudent next step for the board — one that he said should involve the state
Department of Fish and Wildlife given the department’s standing offer to
develop an access for outdoor enthusiasts who want to get out on the pond.
Before a 2012 Vermont Supreme Court ruling, the pond had been off-limits for
more than a century.
According to Halpert, before
incurring costs associated with his drafting a certificate of title for the
property and paying Hannan to conduct a formal survey, the board should first
confirm with the state that the location is workable.
“The goal line here is to build a
fishing access, and where that fishing access goes depends … (on) where
physically on this parcel that folks are going to actually access the water,”
he said, describing it as a logistical concern that could likely be
inexpensively addressed more than a legal issue.
“I think it would be a pretty poor
boat access if you couldn’t access (the pond) by boat,” he said.
Hannan said in an interview
Thursday that answering that question would require some surveying but not an
actual survey. He added that a review of maps on file in Berlin and Montpelier made him pretty confident the parcel has some shoreline.
“I’m pretty sure they’ve got some
water,” he said, echoing an opinion he expressed at Monday night’s board
meeting.
Halpert did suggest the board
initiate the process to re-establish and reclassify the abandoned section of
road, which he maintained is an “unidentified corridor” under the state’s
ancient roads law. Barring action by the town before July 1, 2015 , the old road would revert to adjacent property owners —
in this case Montpelier , which purchased most of the land around the pond in an
effort to protect its public drinking water supply.
As has been the case since the
Vermont Supreme Court struck down long-standing recreational restrictions on
use of the pond, opinions among residents about the prospect of a second access
were mixed.
Some urged the board to
aggressively pursue an access area at that location even though one of the
proponents suggested it probably wouldn’t be much good during the winter
because the pond rarely freezes in the vicinity of the outlet.
However, Phil Gentile wondered
whether it was worth pursuing what was described as an improved access given
the town’s inability to regulate the informal entry point near a culvert on Mirror Lake Road at the south end of the pond.
“If we develop one on this end (of
the pond) there are two access points,” Gentile said. “Don’t think they won’t
use the south end. They will.”
Gentile said board members should
consider that reality before acting. He also worried that the shallow nature of
the north end raised environmental questions that should be evaluated and
wondered whether voters should be asked if they are interested in expending
money for survey and legal work associated with a possible north end access.
Board Chairman Brad Towne said
voters spoke 2-to-1 in favor of gaining access to the pond over town property
last year. And while the town probably couldn’t stop people from getting into
the pond off Mirror
Lake Road , he
said, that access is “not ideal.”
“The least we can do is try and
make it safe,” Towne said.
The board, which has been asked
for nearly a year to impose parking restrictions on Mirror Lake Road , tabled action on a proposed solution it was told may no
longer be needed and probably didn’t make sense.
david.delcore @timesargus.com
***
***